From: Tony Cooper <tonycooper214@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: NIK rises from the dead
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin2!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Tony Cooper <tonycooper214@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Subject: Re: NIK rises from the dead
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 11:26:21 -0400
Lines: 59
Message-ID: <ujv3vctn7cqjsv5v3ac226sr8v63okht2b@4ax.com>
References: <2kn2vc5tpkdm0tus82ipm2r16ho4vman87@4ax.com> <0001HW.1FA1C76D0333CEE97000073692CF@news.giganews.com> <ossrom02lhg@news6.newsguy.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net rhVSFyvdAQQoyiLyK8/gYgf5pujgfUWRGqHLPBQ1kzNLYS8e5X
Cancel-Lock: sha1:xyYuesvFVwwdwygW7V4tS3yKAF0=
User-Agent: ForteAgent/7.00.32.1200
Print Article
Forward Article
On Thu, 26 Oct 2017 10:29:56 -0400, PeterN
<"peter,newdelete"@deleteverizon.net> wrote:

>On 10/26/2017 3:34 AM, Savageduck wrote:
>> On Oct 25, 2017, Tony Cooper wrote
>> (in article<2kn2vc5tpkdm0tus82ipm2r16ho4vman87@4ax.com>):
>> 
>>> DxO has purchased NIK and will continue development.
>>>
>>> https://petapixel.com/2017/10/25/dxo-buys-nik-collection-google-will...
>>> velopment/?mc_cid=54bcc5e002&mc_eid=b307a66a15
>> 
>> I believe that with this move, and what is happening with many of the various
>> plugin, and Adobe alternative developers, 2018 is going to be an interesting
>> year. 2018 is going to be the year of the race to provide the photography
>> world a standalone DAM replacement for LR6, and there are going to be so many
>> contendors it is going to look like a presidential primary.
>> 
>> As far as NIK truly rising from the dead as a set of image enhancement tools,
>> DxO will have to deliver a worthy update/upgrade to surpass what other
>> developers in the field have done since Google pulled the development plug.
>> In my case, various pieces of the NIK Collection are seldom used today.I will
>> watch to see what happens to NIK with a French accent, and I will test it,
>> but for the most part I have moved on.
>> 
>> ColorEfex has been surpassed by On1, Exposure X3, and Luminar.
>
>I have only used On1,
>
>> 
>> Viveza cannot match Luminar, or current editions of On1 Photo RAW.
>
>Again, I have only used On1, and Topaz. For a quick and dirty adjustment 
>I prefer Viveza.
>
>> 
>> Silver Efex Pro has been out done by Exposure X3, Luminar, Tonality, and On1
>> (&  I suspect the Topaz stuff).
>> 
>> HDR Efex Pro was once a benchmark, but no longer. Adobe does a better job
>> today with LR-C CC and ACR, but the current best HDR software is
>> MacPhun