From: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Subject: Re: NIK rises from the dead
Full headers:
From: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Subject: Re: NIK rises from the dead
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 18:13:37 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <261020171813376373%nospam@nospam.invalid>
References: <> <> <> <> <>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info:; posting-host="f8a2a237e12355e07a856bfb8b92a25a";
logging-data="24080"; mail-complaints-to="";posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+X/ubTscLBVl5WZUE1KQGJ"
User-Agent: Thoth/1.9.0 (Mac OS X)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:rDtJFxRyUaSgpJFXntz1djARonw=
Print Article
Forward Article
In article<>, PeterN
<"peter,newdelete"> wrote:

> >> Topaz does a great job, but only on RAW images. I am starting to play
> >> with DxO again.
> >>
> >>
> >> Of course that is all opinion. What I like about NIK is the control
> >> points. With other filters I use masking and blending, which takes much
> >> longer, but it is more accurate, for me.
> > 
> > Free isn't bad, either.
> I have been told that most of the plug in functions can be done in PS, 
> without plugins.

it boils down to how much one values their time and the quality of the