From: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Subject: Re: NIK rises from the dead
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin2!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Subject: Re: NIK rises from the dead
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 18:13:37 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <261020171813376373%nospam@nospam.invalid>
References: <2kn2vc5tpkdm0tus82ipm2r16ho4vman87@4ax.com> <0001HW.1FA1C76D0333CEE97000073692CF@news.giganews.com> <ossrom02lhg@news6.newsguy.com> <ujv3vctn7cqjsv5v3ac226sr8v63okht2b@4ax.com> <ostlv702v2u@news6.newsguy.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="f8a2a237e12355e07a856bfb8b92a25a";
logging-data="24080"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+X/ubTscLBVl5WZUE1KQGJ"
User-Agent: Thoth/1.9.0 (Mac OS X)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:rDtJFxRyUaSgpJFXntz1djARonw=
Print Article
Forward Article
In article<ostlv702v2u@news6.newsguy.com>, PeterN
<"peter,newdelete"@deleteverizon.net> wrote:

> >> Topaz does a great job, but only on RAW images. I am starting to play
> >> with DxO again.
> >>
> >>
> >> Of course that is all opinion. What I like about NIK is the control
> >> points. With other filters I use masking and blending, which takes much
> >> longer, but it is more accurate, for me.
> > 
> > Free isn't bad, either.
> 
> I have been told that most of the plug in functions can be done in PS, 
> without plugins.

it boils down to how much one values their time and the quality of the
results.