From: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Subject: Re: 21 Utterly Incredible Photographs Untouched By Photoshop
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin3!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Subject: Re: 21 Utterly Incredible Photographs Untouched By Photoshop
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2017 16:48:54 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <271020171648544945%nospam@nospam.invalid>
References: <gd47vchqb9q66h9dtrqi8ej4452s6tpnt1@4ax.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="f8a2a237e12355e07a856bfb8b92a25a";
logging-data="5810"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18DCj+WHaEhZnqPqmY8yEHV"
User-Agent: Thoth/1.9.0 (Mac OS X)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:kNZiyvWXkd6sEIGWtw8mHh05ZMI=
Print Article
Forward Article
In article<gd47vchqb9q66h9dtrqi8ej4452s6tpnt1@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens<eric.stevens@sum.co.nz> wrote:

> ... except that I don't believe the claim about phototoshop. Well,
> maybe they haven't touched them with Photoshop but in most cases I
> believe they have been touched with something else.
>
> http://giggag.com/post/32161

photoshopping an image has come to mean retouch, regardless of app
used, just like googling something means search even if someone uses
bing. 

> The point to me is that apart from anything else, they all are of
> interesting subjects.

and well done.