Subject: Re: 21 Utterly Incredible Photographs Untouched By Photoshop
On Sat, 28 Oct 2017 09:11:23 +1300, Eric Stevens<firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>... except that I don't believe the claim about phototoshop. Well,
>maybe they haven't touched them with Photoshop but in most cases I
>believe they have been touched with something else.
The claim is that they are "completely unedited". I guess that depends
on the definition of "edit" they chose. I guess it's possible, but not
even a little exposure tweaking?
>The point to me is that apart from anything else, they all are of