From: Bill W <nothing@nowhere.com>
Subject: Re: 21 Utterly Incredible Photographs Untouched By Photoshop
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin2!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Bill W <nothing@nowhere.com>
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Subject: Re: 21 Utterly Incredible Photographs Untouched By Photoshop
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2017 14:00:25 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <9e77vcpr1v64cqr6msme1pa3614a466rcr@4ax.com>
References: <gd47vchqb9q66h9dtrqi8ej4452s6tpnt1@4ax.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="3c61b0adeb09a8250950b4d05c1693ab";
logging-data="9300"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19SfHCmik/YPcP56o9CsFch1D/e6CxfcR8="
User-Agent: ForteAgent/7.20.32.1218
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 171027-2, 10/27/2017), Outbound message
Cancel-Lock: sha1:xtfXY366plkzSTaUDITBE4cmvs8=
Print Article
Forward Article
On Sat, 28 Oct 2017 09:11:23 +1300, Eric Stevens<eric.stevens@sum.co.nz> wrote:

>... except that I don't believe the claim about phototoshop. Well,
>maybe they haven't touched them with Photoshop but in most cases I
>believe they have been touched with something else.

The claim is that they are "completely unedited". I guess that depends
on the definition of "edit" they chose. I guess it's possible, but not
even a little exposure tweaking? 

>http://giggag.com/post/32161
>
>The point to me is that apart from anything else, they all are of
>interesting subjects.