From: android <here@there.was>
Subject: Re: So this crap wont work with larger sensors?
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: android <here@there.was>
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Subject: Re: So this crap wont work with larger sensors?
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2017 10:11:40 +0100
Organization: the center
Lines: 12
Message-ID: <here-E4C2DF.10114029102017@news.individual.net>
References: <ca01ee77-c861-4d95-92b8-299f643852cc@googlegroups.com>
X-Trace: individual.net t9XtsjfDsvdtdGJsIAvIbAPHyCpL7sB2R5vXibwMAHy/6kZe2S
X-Orig-Path: here
Cancel-Lock: sha1:MTSMJZCo3zzZXwsJL5Ubi5teYgE=
User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.5.2 (Intel Mac OS X)
Print Article
Forward Article
In article<ca01ee77-c861-4d95-92b8-299f643852cc@googlegroups.com>,
 RichA<rander3128@gmail.com> wrote:

> The company has a vague claim that phone sensors are only "25% efficient" 
> whatever that means.
> https://www.dpreview.com/news/2117719553/invisage-reportedly-acquire...

Seems like this firm has been trying to reverse engineer and rewrite BSI 
to avoid licens and prestige loss... It must eat APPL to the core to 
have to use Sony tech in their iPhone cams...
-- 
teleportation kills