From: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Subject: Re: Lightroom CC
Full headers:
From: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Subject: Re: Lightroom CC
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2017 10:29:37 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <291020171029377131%nospam@nospam.invalid>
References: <> <> <> <>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info:; posting-host="165483f2a3a2da85db80fc3ac9d07d60";
logging-data="12335"; mail-complaints-to="";posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+Js7BJpBZ0KU+I1dSZyj3M"
User-Agent: Thoth/1.9.0 (Mac OS X)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:6lVJ+q+EJuncEQ2Wg/XGW3bdoUk=
Print Article
Forward Article
In article<>, android<here@there.was> wrote:

> > > 2) Colour tuning the screen... Linux is not great at colour management 
> > > anyway and now we have a browser in the way too. So how faithful is the 
> > > colour rendering? Do we need to go to an iPad Pro to really review stuff?
> > 
> > I don't do "Mac vs. whatever" and I'm *not* dissing your Linux system
> > in any way. But if you're really into photography what you described
> > above is a crying need for a 27" iMac. The display is phenomenal.
> I had a looksie at the global centre, I live there Mac Premium Reseller 
> and I was not impressed. They had several units standing there and the 
> displays looked at tad shady. 

that's not a very good environment in which to judge.

> A Mini with a good third party display is 
> the prefered budget solution.

but nowhere near as good, and not much cheaper either.