From: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Subject: Re: Lightroom CC
Full headers:
From: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Subject: Re: Lightroom CC
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2017 13:24:34 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 26
Message-ID: <291020171324346977%nospam@nospam.invalid>
References: <> <> <> <>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info:; posting-host="165483f2a3a2da85db80fc3ac9d07d60";
logging-data="22945"; mail-complaints-to="";posting-account="U2FsdGVkX196ELsP6Kgnb1ICc6DrFEwO"
User-Agent: Thoth/1.9.0 (Mac OS X)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:546881/F3fVa4lN+n5gc0q/JSZI=
Print Article
Forward Article
In article<>, Tim Watts<> wrote:

> >> 2) Colour tuning the screen... Linux is not great at colour management
> >> anyway and now we have a browser in the way too. So how faithful is the
> >> colour rendering? Do we need to go to an iPad Pro to really review stuff?
> > 
> > I don't do "Mac vs. whatever" and I'm *not* dissing your Linux system
> > in any way. But if you're really into photography what you described
> > above is a crying need for a 27" iMac. The display is phenomenal.
> > 
> I'm kinda waiting to see what Apple bring out next. It's either going to 
> be a MacBook Pro (which is recently re-released) or something else.

the imac pro is next, expected in a couple of months.

next year will likely have refreshes to the rest of the lineup, quite
possibly with a few surprises, although those who closely watch the
industry have a pretty good idea of what's coming.

> I'd really like a Mac Mini v2 - something that is small, utilises the 
> same screen and keyboard as my other systems but has been refreshed to 
> have a decent CPU and loads of RAM.

the mac mini nearly 15 years old. it's well past v2.