From: Tim Watts <>
Subject: Re: Lightroom CC
Full headers:
From: Tim Watts <>
Subject: Re: Lightroom CC
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2017 19:19:34 +0000
Lines: 31
Message-ID: <>
References: <>
<> <>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: zvhSHXh1ZhRlVfZLz0mnvAtPMypa0s+IZceqtYDdPkYSYo4Tqj
Cancel-Lock: sha1:3UOapLWyTzOpS3omzYCTFOCjL9w=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
In-Reply-To: <291020171324346977%nospam@nospam.invalid>
Content-Language: en-GB
Print Article
Forward Article
On 29/10/17 17:24, nospam wrote:
> In article<>, Tim Watts
><> wrote:
>>>> 2) Colour tuning the screen... Linux is not great at colour management
>>>> anyway and now we have a browser in the way too. So how faithful is the
>>>> colour rendering? Do we need to go to an iPad Pro to really review stuff?
>>> I don't do "Mac vs. whatever" and I'm *not* dissing your Linux system
>>> in any way. But if you're really into photography what you described
>>> above is a crying need for a 27" iMac. The display is phenomenal.
>> I'm kinda waiting to see what Apple bring out next. It's either going to
>> be a MacBook Pro (which is recently re-released) or something else.
> the imac pro is next, expected in a couple of months.
> next year will likely have refreshes to the rest of the lineup, quite
> possibly with a few surprises, although those who closely watch the
> industry have a pretty good idea of what's coming.
>> I'd really like a Mac Mini v2 - something that is small, utilises the
>> same screen and keyboard as my other systems but has been refreshed to
>> have a decent CPU and loads of RAM.
> the mac mini nearly 15 years old. it's well past v2.

Sorry - I meant v2 figuratively. I have no idea what version it is - I 
meant "the next one".