Subject: Re: A lightroom question
Full headers:
X-Received: by 10.55.97.66 with SMTP id v63mr12486613qkb.60.1509330551769;
Sun, 29 Oct 2017 19:29:11 -0700 (PDT)
Path: news.netfront.net!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!z50no5206452qtj.0!news-out.google.com!v14ni3107qtc.0!nntp.google.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!spln!extra.newsguy.com!newsp.newsguy.com!news6
From: PeterN <"peter,newdelete"@deleteverizon.net>
Newsgroups: alt.photography,rec.photo.digital
Subject: Re: A lightroom question
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2017 22:28:06 -0400
Organization: NewsGuy - Unlimited Usenet $23.95
Lines: 35
Message-ID: <ot62v90ckb@news6.newsguy.com>
References: <osqdji017ak@news3.newsguy.com>
<0001HW.1FA0F96C030386DD70000C53C2CF@news.giganews.com>
<ossodb0278v@news3.newsguy.com>
<0001HW.1FA22B1B034B2B927000073692CF@news.giganews.com>
<0001HW.1FA581F7009678177000012602CF@news.giganews.com>
<ot4s9n02t0d@news6.newsguy.com>
<0001HW.1FA6355200C080F07000012602CF@news.giganews.com>
<ot56fi0g5@news6.newsguy.com> <ot5giq$1mtk$1@gioia.aioe.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pc1dfb07ef03f8c117ff8430e4177e7716f550501a22b2a64.newsdawg.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/52.4.0
In-Reply-To: <ot5giq$1mtk$1@gioia.aioe.org>
X-Received-Bytes: 2627
X-Received-Body-CRC: 2491286496
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Print Article
Forward Article
On 10/29/2017 5:17 PM, Mayayana wrote:
> "PeterN" <"peter,newdelete"@deleteverizon.net> wrote
> 
> | I would think that in most cases, editing a JPEG file in LR should not
> | make any difference, because you are only changing the instructions, not
> | working on the file itself. No matter how many times you edit the file,
> | there will only be one change,and that will be when you save it.
> | each additional edit will be on another copy of the file.
> |
> | <https://havecamerawilltravel.com/lightroom/jpgs-lightroom/>
> |
> 
>      He's a bit evasive, focussing on how you can
> make edits and save them as memory in LR. What
> you say matches his description. That's fine, but if
> you edit a JPG you eventually have to save it again
> and that's going to degrade it. No way around that.
> "Only one change" is one change too many if it wasn't
> necessary. If you work with them in LR as
> TIFs and never deal with JPG except to save for
> some target that requires JPG, isn't that the best
> option?
>    In other words, why not RAW -> TIF  and then
> only save to JPG if you have to for the sake of size
> or recipient limitations? JPG shouldn't be thought of
> as a storage format. It's only used for photos
> because it's universal and most people don't edit.
> It's *not* used because it's an appropriate format.
> 
> 

Yes. But I was responding to the situation where there already are JPEGs.

-- 
PeterN