Subject: Re: A lightroom question
On 10/29/2017 5:17 PM, Mayayana wrote:
> "PeterN" <"peter,newdelete"@deleteverizon.net> wrote
> | I would think that in most cases, editing a JPEG file in LR should not
> | make any difference, because you are only changing the instructions, not
> | working on the file itself. No matter how many times you edit the file,
> | there will only be one change,and that will be when you save it.
> | each additional edit will be on another copy of the file.
> | <https://havecamerawilltravel.com/lightroom/jpgs-lightroom/>
> He's a bit evasive, focussing on how you can
> make edits and save them as memory in LR. What
> you say matches his description. That's fine, but if
> you edit a JPG you eventually have to save it again
> and that's going to degrade it. No way around that.
> "Only one change" is one change too many if it wasn't
> necessary. If you work with them in LR as
> TIFs and never deal with JPG except to save for
> some target that requires JPG, isn't that the best
> In other words, why not RAW -> TIF and then
> only save to JPG if you have to for the sake of size
> or recipient limitations? JPG shouldn't be thought of
> as a storage format. It's only used for photos
> because it's universal and most people don't edit.
> It's *not* used because it's an appropriate format.
Yes. But I was responding to the situation where there already are JPEGs.