From: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Subject: Re: Windows 10. Horrible!
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin3!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Subject: Re: Windows 10. Horrible!
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2017 17:34:31 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <301020171734314730%nospam@nospam.invalid>
References: <8f933433-4590-4ce1-8633-43fef8eac186@googlegroups.com> <5ipjce-a7m.ln1@Telcontar.valinor> <ot7i7g$oo$1@dont-email.me> <j49fvctb7ktfc4g567lrfjko0qs8tjkm1v@4ax.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="a6f0ee69e2840d17357faef70c37ec27";
logging-data="6165"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19GXgflW8Bqj2nSmwNvo/Rn"
User-Agent: Thoth/1.9.0 (Mac OS X)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:sMM4emBgbyhAANn7V0trwReo4yA=
Print Article
Forward Article
In article<j49fvctb7ktfc4g567lrfjko0qs8tjkm1v@4ax.com>,<10-4.call@internet.org> wrote:

> >Good question, but the resulting discussion may be helpful to those who 
> >run all their digital photography software on Windows.  Contrary to Mr. 
> >Anderson, I've had no problems with Win-10, and that may be an 
> >encouragement to anyone considering upgrading their hardware, and 
> >perhaps concerned that it comes with Win-10.
> 
> I run all that software on Windows 98se or Windows XP. It works just
> fine. 

all what software? nothing recent runs in those, which weren't stable
nor secure anyway. 

you're clearly trolling.

> No one needs all the bloat in Windows 10. I would not touch Win10
> if it was free. 

it was for its first year, but only from win7/8.