Subject: Re: Windows 10. Horrible!
Full headers:
From: David Taylor <>
Subject: Re: Windows 10. Horrible!
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2017 07:47:02 +0000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 23
Message-ID: <ot99pn$haj$>
References: <>
<5ipjce-a7m.ln1@Telcontar.valinor> <ot7i7g$oo$>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2017 07:47:03 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info:; posting-host="af6fa8e19fb5cf668df98622df453138";
logging-data="17747"; mail-complaints-to="";posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+WH/zmnmEti0pyrIOJLb4emJssAa3qf4I="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
In-Reply-To: <>
Content-Language: en-GB
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Xw//wGxSecHToN7uS4nRh/ZJZEM=
Print Article
Forward Article
On 30/10/2017 22:18, wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Oct 2017 15:58:39 +0000, David Taylor
><> wrote:
>> Good question, but the resulting discussion may be helpful to those who
>> run all their digital photography software on Windows.  Contrary to Mr.
>> Anderson, I've had no problems with Win-10, and that may be an
>> encouragement to anyone considering upgrading their hardware, and
>> perhaps concerned that it comes with Win-10.
> I run all that software on Windows 98se or Windows XP. It works just
> fine. No one needs all the bloat in Windows 10. I would not touch Win10
> if it was free.

Good luck if those older systems are Internet connected!

But were you to upgrade, you wouldn't lose that software (unlike Apple's 
iOS upgrades orphaning 32-bit programs).