From: philo <>
Subject: Re: Windows 10. Horrible!
Full headers:
From: philo <>
Subject: Re: Windows 10. Horrible!
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2017 18:35:59 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <otb1d0$t7l$>
References: <>
<ota72v$a08$> <>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2017 23:36:00 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info:; posting-host="577a889a7f5251edf286eefe390078d3";
logging-data="29941"; mail-complaints-to="";posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+mVUWrJEJWGQKnd/mnqrTsrumpocVIRaQ="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
In-Reply-To: <>
Content-Language: en-US
Cancel-Lock: sha1:aXJ3arvbeO+J6Hi4hKkL9nA56gs=
Print Article
Forward Article
On 10/31/2017 04:41 PM, Alfred Molon wrote:
> In article<>, PeterN says...
>> In the
>> interest of fairness, may main machine is Win 7.
> I'm using 8.1 here. It has a horrible reputation, but with the classic
> shell it works perfectly smoothly without any problems.
> Before I was using Vista, another of those supposedly terrible OSs.
> Worked fine for me as well. I skipped Win 7.

Once SP1 was applied, Vista was just fine. I think MS just released it 
before it was quite ready.

As to Win8

Every single machine I've worked on had to have Classic Shell installed.
No one liked it the way it was.