From: Rich A <>
Subject: Re: Windows 10. Horrible!
Full headers:
X-Received: by with SMTP id h29mr3395471qtk.19.1509523871611;
Wed, 01 Nov 2017 01:11:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by with SMTP id o195mr385801vke.4.1509523871516;
Wed, 01 Nov 2017 01:11:11 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2017 01:11:11 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <ota72v$a08$>
Injection-Info:; posting-host=;
References: <> <ota72v$a08$>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <>
Subject: Re: Windows 10. Horrible!
From: Rich A <>
Injection-Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2017 08:11:11 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Body-CRC: 3837081127
X-Received-Bytes: 2388
Print Article
Forward Article
On Tuesday, October 31, 2017 at 12:06:59 PM UTC-4, philo wrote:
> On 10/30/2017 02:17 AM, Rich A wrote:
> > Wow!  Didn't know it had so many issues!  Made a horrific mess of running multiple different
displays (even with specific video card drivers), hides tons of stuff that I normally use (like
control panel). Boxes the active desktop into a frame INSIDE the main computer screen, so it's
smaller.  I'm sure there is a way around it, but I couldn't be bothered. There are myriad issues
with it, which I found out looking up problems online.  Windows 8..1 is FAR better, IMO.
> > 
> I have two , secondary use machines that I've upgrade to Win10, both 
> work fine.
> My wife is the one who does the real, photo-processing work and I'm 
> keeping it at Win7. It works perfectly and I do not want to take a 
> chance with that machine.

Even if it did work seamlessly for me, I don't like the changes from Win 7/8.  I thought 7 was a
major improvement on XP, but I used XP for almost a decade anyway.  IMO, XP was the first really
solid Microsoft OS.