Subject: Re: On "real" photography vs collage
In article <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Mayayana<email@example.com> wrote:
> Interesting development apropos of last week's discussion:
> I can't say that I really understand this technology,
or any other technology.
> but it apparently uses something like an internal
> software argument to systematically improve on a
> result. what they've done is to generate realistic
> faces from limited data. I could imagine this being
> used for image improvement. Example: Feed a bad
> photo into a program and then give it good photos
> of the people in photo #1, with the result being
> a "clean-up" of those faces.
that's already happening.