Subject: Re: On "real" photography vs collage
On Wednesday, 1 November 2017 13:43:23 UTC, Mayayana wrote:
> Interesting development apropos of last week's discussion:
> I can't say that I really understand this technology,
> but it apparently uses something like an internal
> software argument to systematically improve on a
> result. what they've done is to generate realistic
> faces from limited data. I could imagine this being
> used for image improvement. Example: Feed a bad
> photo into a program and then give it good photos
> of the people in photo #1, with the result being
> a "clean-up" of those faces.
> The result would be something like a "realistic
> fabrication", just as these sample faces are.
> They all look convincing to me, except for the
> second image in from the top left and the second
> one down from the top left, which both look
> like cross-dressers.
cross-dressers do exist and not everyone looks or is either 100% male or 100% female.
>I find it intriguing that the
> software seems to be able to put a soul behind
> the eyes, so to speak, but has trouble with the
> subtleties of gender features.
I don't see it that way, but what interests me more is where these are photographs and could they be
entered into say a portait section of a photogrphy competition as they are about as real as my
favourite warbird. (Romulan)