From: Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz>
Subject: Re: On "real" photography vs collage
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!peer01.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!post01.iad!fx02.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz>
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Subject: Re: On "real" photography vs collage
Message-ID: <1ibkvcphi37hc2a3801estqrlrufa4n5sr@4ax.com>
References: <otcj1m$1160$1@gioia.aioe.org> <011120170949482586%nospam@nospam.invalid>
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 33
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Forte - www.forteinc.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2017 09:28:14 +1300
X-Received-Body-CRC: 1448093666
X-Received-Bytes: 1806
Print Article
Forward Article
On Wed, 01 Nov 2017 09:49:48 -0400, nospam<nospam@nospam.invalid>
wrote:

>In article <otcj1m$1160$1@gioia.aioe.org>, Mayayana
><mayayana@invalid.nospam> wrote:
>
>> Interesting development apropos of last week's discussion:
>> 
>>
>> https://hothardware.com/news/nvidia-neural-network-generates-photore...
>> ces-disturbing-results
>> 
>>   I can't say that I really understand this technology,
>
>or any other technology.

  --- aaah! Sweetness and light!
>
>> but it apparently uses something like an internal
>> software argument to systematically improve on a
>> result. what they've done is to generate realistic
>> faces from limited data. I could imagine this being
>> used for image improvement. Example: Feed a bad
>> photo into a program and then give it good photos
>> of the people in photo #1, with the result being
>> a "clean-up" of those faces.
>
>that's already happening.
-- 

Regards,

Eric Stevens