From: John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: A lightroom question
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin2!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net>
Newsgroups: alt.photography,rec.photo.digital
Subject: Re: A lightroom question
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2017 14:25:26 -0700
Organization: Sept. all the time
Lines: 33
Message-ID: <otde46$tnp$1@dont-email.me>
References: <osqdji017ak@news3.newsguy.com>
<0001HW.1FA0F96C030386DD70000C53C2CF@news.giganews.com>
<ossodb0278v@news3.newsguy.com>
<0001HW.1FA22B1B034B2B927000073692CF@news.giganews.com>
<0001HW.1FA581F7009678177000012602CF@news.giganews.com>
<ot4s9n02t0d@news6.newsguy.com>
<0001HW.1FA6355200C080F07000012602CF@news.giganews.com>
<ot56fi0g5@news6.newsguy.com> <ot5giq$1mtk$1@gioia.aioe.org>
<0001HW.1FA68BD300D4C70E7000012602CF@news.giganews.com>
<ot5lh5$1tq5$1@gioia.aioe.org>
<0001HW.1FA69D7C00D8EABE7000012602CF@news.giganews.com>
<ot5rs9$60q$1@gioia.aioe.org>
<0001HW.1FA6C09100E123AA7000012602CF@news.giganews.com>
<ot68r3$bb9$1@dont-email.me> <ot77bm$6k2$1@gioia.aioe.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2017 21:25:26 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="d5a31f89b6ca5b92d28dea269fd8afff";
logging-data="30457"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+W2LLjdTzYh/x8IwsKmrilGK/A6+YvtTU="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:52.0)
Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0
In-Reply-To: <ot77bm$6k2$1@gioia.aioe.org>
Content-Language: en-US
Cancel-Lock: sha1:TVksyS/YTbKHQYa5pfneYwFAk9s=
Print Article
Forward Article
On 10/30/17   PDT 5:52 AM, Mayayana wrote:
> "John McWilliams"<jpmcw@comcast.net> wrote
> 
>>
> Listen to The Duck. He knows whereof he speaks. Me, I worked only on V2
> and 3 of LR.....
>>
> 
> What is it I said that you disagree with?

The same corrections that The Duck made.
> 
> That saving out of LR to JPG is lossy?
> 
> That images coming from the camera as JPG
> have lost data?
> 
> That a JPG is actually a bitmap stored in a
> compressed file format?
> 
> Did you actually read what I wrote? I was never
> questioning SD's methods or his explanations
> about LR.
> 
>    I've agreed over and over that the process LR
> uses can be used to edit the image without loss,
> inside LR. All I'm saying is that it's important to
> recognize that LR is not somehow magically
> transcending the limitations of JPG. It's merely
> storing data about edits.

I'm pretty sure that he didn't assert the above paragraph.