From: Mayayana <mayayana@invalid.nospam>
Subject: Re: Windows 10. Horrible!
Full headers:
From: "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam>
Subject: Re: Windows 10. Horrible!
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2017 18:20:33 -0400
Organization: NNTP Server
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <otdhd9$qk2$>
References: <> <ota72v$a08$> <> <> <otbah6$10c3$> <otbuml$qkc$> <otchr5$v4h$> <otcslc$do7$>
X-Priority: 3
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5512
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5512
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Print Article
Forward Article
"David Taylor"<> wrote

|    I don't accept your statement that networked
| machines shouldn't be connected to the Internet.

  They're high risk. Many people want to be able to
network their computers. Maybe you find it a hassle
to walk downstairs with a USB stick to move a file.
That's understandable. Networking is convenient.
But there is high risk. there's nothing there to "accept"
or not. You're choosing convenience over risk. The
only thing more risky would be to not acknowledge

  That's why we have hacks of Home Depot, Target,
etc. Access online is connected to the backend data.
Those sites will be hacked until they stop connecting
the internal network online. I once saw somewhere that
the CIA (or is it the FBI?) gives 2 computers to each
agent in their office. One is internal. One is Internet-