From: Whisky-dave <whisky.dave@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Windows 10. Horrible!
Full headers:
X-Received: by 10.200.4.167 with SMTP id s39mr2173798qtg.3.1509620379465;
Thu, 02 Nov 2017 03:59:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.31.161.87 with SMTP id k84mr236559vke.7.1509620379368; Thu,
02 Nov 2017 03:59:39 -0700 (PDT)
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin3!goblin.stu.neva.ru!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!k31no777664qta.1!news-out.google.com!v14ni1653qtc.0!nntp.google.com!k31no777663qta.1!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2017 03:59:39 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <otcslc$do7$1@dont-email.me>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=138.37.90.65; posting-account=Fal3rgoAAABua4brvRuRwdmPfigIDi6x
NNTP-Posting-Host: 138.37.90.65
References: <8f933433-4590-4ce1-8633-43fef8eac186@googlegroups.com>
<ota72v$a08$1@dont-email.me> <otaa0u01gl1@news4.newsguy.com>
<MPG.34630c823612378998cef3@news.supernews.com> <otbah6$10c3$1@gioia.aioe.org>
<otbuml$qkc$1@dont-email.me> <otchr5$v4h$1@gioia.aioe.org> <otcslc$do7$1@dont-email.me>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <85a3c925-23ef-4c09-b30a-9c1bfbbf2292@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Windows 10. Horrible!
From: Whisky-dave <whisky.dave@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2017 10:59:39 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 27
Print Article
Forward Article
On Wednesday, 1 November 2017 16:27:28 UTC, David Taylor  wrote:
> On 01/11/2017 13:21, Mayayana wrote:
> > "David Taylor"<david-taylor@blueyonder.co.uk.invalid> wrote
> > 
> > | >    The chatter about older versions being unsafe is
> > | > also, for the most part, only chatter.
> > | []
> > |
> > | Try telling that to the UK's NHS and others:
> > |
> > |
> > https://www.theguardian.com/society/2017/may/19/nhs-cyber-attack-ran...
> > |
> > 
> >    ?? You don't seem to realize that you're illustrating
> > my point for me.==============================
> 
> The point is that anyone running XP needs to be very careful if Internet 
> connected.  That's all.  I don't accept your statement that networked 
> machines shouldn't be connected to the Internet.
> 
> Get the message across to folk - be careful and vigilant, what ever OS 
> you're using, and keep that OS updated.  Simple!

trouble is you can't keep XP updated withoutn moving on past XP to windows 10.
Sitting at a machine running XP with it's latest updates isn't protection that is up to date.