Subject: Re: Inca Trail and Battery Charging
Full headers:
X-Received: by with SMTP id u65mr3006006qku.18.1509641437073;
Thu, 02 Nov 2017 09:50:37 -0700 (PDT)
From: PeterN <"peter,newdelete">
Subject: Re: Inca Trail and Battery Charging
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2017 12:49:44 -0400
Organization: NewsGuy - Unlimited Usenet $23.95
Lines: 49
Message-ID: <>
References: <ot56kb$mmj$>
<011120170909176705%nospam@nospam.invalid> <>
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
In-Reply-To: <011120171411053228%nospam@nospam.invalid>
X-Received-Bytes: 2998
X-Received-Body-CRC: 379097948
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Print Article
Forward Article
On 11/1/2017 2:11 PM, nospam wrote:
> In article<>, PeterN
> <"peter,newdelete"> wrote:
>>> meanwhile, those with digital cameras can shoot several thousand photos
>>> on a memory card the size of a postage stamp, and in some cases, on a
>>> single battery charge.
>> I suppose you know Which camera they use, and whether they shoot only in
>> RAW.
> absolutely. why would you think otherwise?
>> Good quality high capacity cards are not cheap.
> compared to another trip, yes they are.
>> I would find out at
>> which points there are provisions for back ups to the cloud. I would get
>> no higher capacity cards than they estimate will be shooting in one day,
>> + a fudge factor of 25%. Bring as many cards, as days they will be away
>> from a place where they can backup to the cloud.
> i suppose you know how fast the internet service is, that it won't be
> overloaded when you want to use it, what computer they have and what
> version operating system is installed.
>> As I see it power for batteries is the biggest problem. Depending on
>> their camera's battery usage, figure battery usage per day, and bring
>> bring enough batteries to get them to the charging station furthest from
>> the preceding station. While there is a fair amount of  planning
>> involved.
> actually, very little planning.
>> it is worth doing so.
> that's the whole point.

Your creative snipping does not make it clear that you made the 
statement I responded to.
Our other comments are obviously intended to start an argument. Sorry I 
won't bite.