From: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Subject: Re: Windows 10. Horrible!
Full headers:
From: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Subject: Re: Windows 10. Horrible!
Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2017 21:47:34 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 62
Message-ID: <021120172147349824%nospam@nospam.invalid>
References: <> <ota72v$a08$> <> <> <otbah6$10c3$> <otbuml$qkc$> <otchr5$v4h$> <otcslc$do7$> <> <otf9e1$1kd$> <> <otggv9$jpm$>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info:; posting-host="8f0ad8b6e5e4c30afa8a484798c0278d";
logging-data="8636"; mail-complaints-to="";posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19+VZ0cBm5CUVEjs+UnQydg"
User-Agent: Thoth/1.9.0 (Mac OS X)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:zYcFlZcD4hEEWE+izZ9ZnZM+Vv8=
Print Article
Forward Article
In article <otggv9$jpm$>, Mayayana<mayayana@invalid.nospam> wrote:

> | But the careful use of the latest version is better than the careful
> | use of an old version.
>   I think another way of looking at this is....
> If you don't want to be hobbled by good security

hobbled by good security?

> but you're willing to buy a new computer in order
> to be more secure, then why not buy a Mac?

good advice.

> Macs have far less trouble and probably will
> for at least the near-term future. 

has someone hacked your account?? 

you're talking sense.

> They cost
> more

no they don't.

> but they also have resale value.

yes they do.

> Macs are
> the AOL of computers. 

no they aren't.

> They put you in a suburban
> playpen

that doesn't even make any sense.

> and take care of security for you.

which is a good thing.

> It's not
> failsafe,

nothing is 100% failsafe.

however, macs are among the closest to it.

> but if you're not going to take the trouble
> to *really* be careful then a Mac is a much safer
> choice.... assuming it will run the software you
> need. 

macs can run mac/windows/unix software, all natively. 

no other system can do that.