From: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Subject: Re: Windows 10. Horrible!
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin2!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Subject: Re: Windows 10. Horrible!
Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2017 13:14:54 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 12
Message-ID: <031120171314542647%nospam@nospam.invalid>
References: <8f933433-4590-4ce1-8633-43fef8eac186@googlegroups.com> <ota72v$a08$1@dont-email.me> <otaa0u01gl1@news4.newsguy.com> <MPG.34630c823612378998cef3@news.supernews.com> <otbah6$10c3$1@gioia.aioe.org> <otbuml$qkc$1@dont-email.me> <otchr5$v4h$1@gioia.aioe.org> <otcslc$do7$1@dont-email.me> <85a3c925-23ef-4c09-b30a-9c1bfbbf2292@googlegroups.com> <otf9e1$1kd$1@gioia.aioe.org> <bd0d2f62-eacf-4dc4-ab83-b46e6398757a@googlegroups.com> <otfkge$ppg$1@gioia.aioe.org> <b699e45b-faea-48ac-b84f-692b8f9d638a@googlegroups.com> <othskk$146l$1@gioia.aioe.org> <b222c236-570a-4e3d-83b3-7bd91886fa23@googlegroups.com> <031120171103444825%nospam@nospam.invalid> <c8c39b2a-a2aa-4066-a112-4ccfb8c56ced@googlegroups.com> <031120171135570800%nospam@nospam.invalid> <oti82m0mq2@news7.newsguy.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="8f0ad8b6e5e4c30afa8a484798c0278d";
logging-data="7948"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18Bv3fZkEZiFxh3cri15DcZ"
User-Agent: Thoth/1.9.0 (Mac OS X)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:ANp/sAHBWiDVj0AEJtQYS1vVLuI=
Print Article
Forward Article
In article<oti82m0mq2@news7.newsguy.com>, PeterN
<"peter,newdelete"@deleteverizon.net> wrote:

> > burning users *twice* is not a good long term strategy.
> 
> Burning them even once is not a good long term strategy.

true, but not as bad as twice.

> Old saying: Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.

exactly.