From: Whisky-dave <>
Subject: Re: Inca Trail and Battery Charging
Full headers:
X-Received: by with SMTP id w15mr11337534qka.25.1509969268653;
Mon, 06 Nov 2017 03:54:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by with SMTP id x82mr1282313vkd.3.1509969268555; Mon,
06 Nov 2017 03:54:28 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2017 03:54:28 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <>
Injection-Info:; posting-host=; posting-account=Fal3rgoAAABua4brvRuRwdmPfigIDi6x
References: <ot56kb$mmj$> <291020171614509926%nospam@nospam.invalid>
<> <291020172336149021%nospam@nospam.invalid>
<> <311020171018104834%nospam@nospam.invalid>
<> <311020171241451719%nospam@nospam.invalid>
<> <011120170909176705%nospam@nospam.invalid>
<> <>
<> <>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <>
Subject: Re: Inca Trail and Battery Charging
From: Whisky-dave <>
Injection-Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2017 11:54:28 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 71
Print Article
Forward Article
On Friday, 3 November 2017 15:12:32 UTC, -hh  wrote:
> On Friday, November 3, 2017 at 9:31:11 AM UTC-4, Whisky-dave wrote:
> > On Thursday, 2 November 2017 17:35:44 UTC, PeterN  wrote:
> > > 
> > > Places to upload to the cloud prescriptively have power to
> > > recharge the batteries.
> > 
> > But you won't find such a place at the top of machu picchu that is the point.
> As of a ~decade ago, the only establishment at the top was
> the Sanctuary Lodge.  There's been attempts to close it, but 
> its reportedly still open:
> <
> I was able to find a simple room rate; a mere $650/night (+10% tax)
> which includes WiFi, but not breakfast.  The same room with full
> board is $1100/night (after the 10% tax) which is why most visitors
> choose instead to stay elsewhere (down in Aguas Calientes).

As the OP implied it's whether you have battery power for taking phosos is what's important.

> WiFi is technically available,

You can't use wifi to take photos.

>but the level of bandwidth
> needed for a significant data dump is the risk, 

Yes if you get that far.

>and this 
> IMO includes the town of Aguas Calientes.  Their only land 
> connection to the outside world is the train line and their 
> relevant communication lines are IMO probably along the same 
> train route.  The rail has had semi-regular seasonal breaks 
> in service from spring floods washing out a section, which 
> would likely also take out their communication too, although 
> when this does happen, the tourism is suspended.  Even so, 
> when you have 5,000 tourists arriving back at their hotels 
> each evening, the network is going to get crunched. 

Yes that would also cause problems.
> As such, I'd be reluctant to assume that I'd be readily able 
> to data dump from cards at this stop.  Sure, one may get 
> lucky, but for planning purposes, I'd assume nothing more
> optimistic than having the first reasonably reliable backup 
> opportunity (via an Internet Kiosk) probably won't be until 
> returning back to Cuzco...

and depending on your data plan and speeds perhaps not viable at all.
But the most important thing to have is power no power no photos no backup nothing.

> The implications here are that one will need to have +1 more 
> day's worth of {power & memory cards} after the days on the
> trail before getting to a hotel to check in & having the 
> opportunity for a systems 'recover' (be this power and/or data).
> And since MP is a journey highlight, it can be expected to
> be a day with a much higher demand for photo taking.  
> -hh