From: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Subject: Re: Windows 10. Horrible!
Full headers:
From: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Subject: Re: Windows 10. Horrible!
Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2017 14:30:29 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <061120171430290907%nospam@nospam.invalid>
References: <> <ota72v$a08$> <> <> <otbah6$10c3$> <otbuml$qkc$> <otchr5$v4h$> <otcslc$do7$> <> <otf9e1$1kd$> <> <otfkge$ppg$> <> <othskk$146l$> <> <> <> <>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info:; posting-host="7599fe501c5775bea081c5ba05a8b63b";
logging-data="32065"; mail-complaints-to="";posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18XwHtagKqwEqJcJKJHWiTJ"
User-Agent: Thoth/1.9.0 (Mac OS X)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:wKR6YxgyEu4gMm/pvUXRI8M98io=
Print Article
Forward Article
In article<>, Alfred
Molon<> wrote:

> > At work I'm still using a Mac from 2011 if this was a PC it'd be thrown out
> > by now and a new one brought like the ones in the lab after about 2 years
> > get replaced.
> > So yes we buy more PCs because we thrown more out per year as not being fit
> > for purpose.
> Well no. PCs are being replaced so often because they are so cheap. 

no, they're being replaced because they're junk and incapable of doing
the tasks people need to do. they bought on price, not whether it's the
best tool for the job.

a quality product would last longer and not need to repeatedly be
replaced, thereby being cheaper in the long run.

speaking of cheap, how's that disposable camera with it's plastic
de-centered lens working out for you?