From: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Subject: Re: Blurred photo?
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin2!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Subject: Re: Blurred photo?
Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2017 13:03:16 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <071120171303160684%nospam@nospam.invalid>
References: <delMB.177230$0z5.116720@fx07.fr7> <071120171248012172%not@aol.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="ffe14b1fba3a6654180863c476976ed1";
logging-data="22884"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/fJ9DnfUotgtb0zhTtgjRb"
User-Agent: Thoth/1.9.0 (Mac OS X)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:sfHxw1a6JETbbhc2pDgai7FSVGQ=
Print Article
Forward Article
In article <071120171248012172%not@aol.com>, Scott Schuckert<not@aol.com> wrote:

> > Blurred photo? Instead of deleting it, software could make it sharp again
> > 
> > The end of low res and blurry images could be nigh.
> > 
> >
> > http://home.bt.com/tech-gadgets/photography/artificial-intelligence...
> > enhancenet-sharpens-photos-11364227072791
> 
> Sorry, that's not a "photograph". It's an eye-pleasing reconstruction,
> filling in details that don't actually exist. (