Subject: Re: Stuck Filters
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!peer01.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!spln!extra.newsguy.com!newsp.newsguy.com!news4
From: PeterN <"peter,newdelete"@deleteverizon.net>
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Subject: Re: Stuck Filters
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2017 22:59:45 -0500
Organization: NewsGuy - Unlimited Usenet $23.95
Lines: 48
Message-ID: <ottvfg1314@news4.newsguy.com>
References: <ccjsvcleg5vcdf3l0825fpkh6r9r0km3al@4ax.com>
<rb0tvchepq6vj5t7ineq6t5q995vrh9qok@4ax.com>
<3p3tvc5q9mds2j1vju6q40n86u88ms25qb@4ax.com>
<0001HW.1FAED4FD011BF2327000079342CF@news.giganews.com>
<otpvla02a2u@news7.newsguy.com>
<0001HW.1FB0D1920193246A700006E012CF@news.giganews.com>
<otqb0n0l5s@news4.newsguy.com>
<0001HW.1FB10B5201A0AD47700006E012CF@news.giganews.com>
<otstch02d2i@news4.newsguy.com>
<0001HW.1FB23B110031E64A70000C23F2CF@news.giganews.com>
<ottei502p62@news4.newsguy.com>
<fIKdndMxgZe535_HnZ2dnUU7-b_NnZ2d@giganews.com>
<071120171841197711%nospam@nospam.invalid>
<6LGdndCoffiYxJ_HnZ2dnUU7-TPNnZ2d@giganews.com>
<071120172018045993%nospam@nospam.invalid>
<fb2dnZSTmK_l5p_HnZ2dnUU7-TXNnZ2d@giganews.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: p476d5a4b18c34b3aa35ac446469a7e878032c9a7a1a5fd94.newsdawg.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/52.4.0
In-Reply-To: <fb2dnZSTmK_l5p_HnZ2dnUU7-TXNnZ2d@giganews.com>
Content-Language: en-US
X-Received-Body-CRC: 2632540365
X-Received-Bytes: 3229
Print Article
Forward Article
On 11/7/2017 10:35 PM, Ron C wrote:
> On 11/7/2017 8:18 PM, nospam wrote:
>> In article<6LGdndCoffiYxJ_HnZ2dnUU7-TPNnZ2d@giganews.com>, Ron C
>><r.capik@verizon.net> wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>> Yes, his suggestive was that I go back to an old wet darkroom 
>>>>>>>> method.
>>>>>>>> Dodge the really light areas, using black cardboard or my hands. 
>>>>>>>> There
>>>>>>>> is a lot of trial and error, but it works. After a while I got a 
>>>>>>>> sense
>>>>>>>> of how long to dodge. And with the dynamic range of my camera,
>>>>>>>> corrections can be made in post.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> When was this?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A few years ago
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm really confused. How in the world can one use their hand
>>>>> or black cardboard to dodge a digital photo?
>>>>>
>>>>> None of the tools/brushes in Photoshop seem to be set up to
>>>>> emulate those [hand/cardboard] tools of old.
>>>>
>>>> the dodge/burn tool does exactly that.
>>>>
>>>> however, there are much better options available now.
>>>>
>>> Nothing that I know of in Photoshop emulates the actual
>>> physical actions of hand/cardboard dodging.
>>
>> now you know.
>>
>> <https://helpx.adobe.com/photoshop/using/dodge-burn-image-areas.html&...
>>