From: Whisky-dave <whisky.dave@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Blurred photo?
Full headers:
X-Received: by 10.200.28.98 with SMTP id j31mr1298319qtk.57.1510138063923;
Wed, 08 Nov 2017 02:47:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.31.32.204 with SMTP id g195mr150743vkg.10.1510138063834;
Wed, 08 Nov 2017 02:47:43 -0800 (PST)
Path: news.netfront.net!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!k31no112547qta.1!news-out.google.com!r5ni370qtc.1!nntp.google.com!z50no112463qtj.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2017 02:47:43 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <071120171303160684%nospam@nospam.invalid>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=138.37.90.65; posting-account=Fal3rgoAAABua4brvRuRwdmPfigIDi6x
NNTP-Posting-Host: 138.37.90.65
References: <delMB.177230$0z5.116720@fx07.fr7> <071120171248012172%not@aol.com>
<071120171303160684%nospam@nospam.invalid>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <5b3ec9c5-8208-4de8-b9d8-be2cf9c05afc@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Blurred photo?
From: Whisky-dave <whisky.dave@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2017 10:47:43 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Lines: 25
Print Article
Forward Article
On Tuesday, 7 November 2017 18:03:21 UTC, nospam  wrote:
> In article <071120171248012172%not@aol.com>, Scott Schuckert
><not@aol.com> wrote:
> 
> > > Blurred photo? Instead of deleting it, software could make it sharp again
> > > 
> > > The end of low res and blurry images could be nigh.
> > > 
> > >
> > > http://home.bt.com/tech-gadgets/photography/artificial-intelligence...
> > > enhancenet-sharpens-photos-11364227072791
> > 
> > Sorry, that's not a "photograph". It's an eye-pleasing reconstruction,
> > filling in details that don't actually exist. (³automated texture
> > synthesis² that aims to recreate realistic textures in images)
> 
> *all* photographs have some amount of what you call eye-pleasing
> reconstruction and filling in details that don't actually exist.
> 
> computational photography is the next big thing.

A bit like Synthehol, it'll catch on for those with limited appreciation of the real thing.