From: Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz>
Subject: Re: Blurred photo?
Full headers:
X-Received: by 10.200.25.194 with SMTP id s2mr2564208qtk.1.1510174096031;
Wed, 08 Nov 2017 12:48:16 -0800 (PST)
Path: news.netfront.net!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!z50no153977qtj.0!news-out.google.com!v14ni510qtc.0!nntp.google.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!post02.iad!fx02.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz>
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Subject: Re: Blurred photo?
Message-ID: <n8r60dpc9a79sjb6512edngea1mcsbnusi@4ax.com>
References: <delMB.177230$0z5.116720@fx07.fr7> <071120171248012172%not@aol.com> <071120171303160684%nospam@nospam.invalid> <5b3ec9c5-8208-4de8-b9d8-be2cf9c05afc@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
MIME-Version: 1.0
Lines: 33
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Forte - www.forteinc.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2017 09:48:04 +1300
X-Received-Bytes: 2030
X-Received-Body-CRC: 988014340
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Original-Bytes: 1886
Print Article
Forward Article
On Wed, 8 Nov 2017 02:47:43 -0800 (PST), Whisky-dave<whisky.dave@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Tuesday, 7 November 2017 18:03:21 UTC, nospam  wrote:
>> In article <071120171248012172%not@aol.com>, Scott Schuckert
>><not@aol.com> wrote:
>> 
>> > > Blurred photo? Instead of deleting it, software could make it sharp again
>> > > 
>> > > The end of low res and blurry images could be nigh.
>> > > 
>> > >
>> > > http://home.bt.com/tech-gadgets/photography/artificial-intelligence...
>> > > enhancenet-sharpens-photos-11364227072791
>> > 
>> > Sorry, that's not a "photograph". It's an eye-pleasing reconstruction,
>> > filling in details that don't actually exist. (³automated texture
>> > synthesis² that aims to recreate realistic textures in images)
>> 
>> *all* photographs have some amount of what you call eye-pleasing
>> reconstruction and filling in details that don't actually exist.
>> 
>> computational photography is the next big thing.
>
>A bit like Synthehol, it'll catch on for those with limited appreciation of the real thing.

From what little I know I expect that in certain respects it will
exceed the capabilities of the real thing. Time will tell.
-- 

Regards,

Eric Stevens