From: Ron C <r.capik@verizon.net>
Subject: Re: Stuck Filters
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2017 19:25:43 -0600
Subject: Re: Stuck Filters
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
References: <ccjsvcleg5vcdf3l0825fpkh6r9r0km3al@4ax.com>
<rb0tvchepq6vj5t7ineq6t5q995vrh9qok@4ax.com>
<3p3tvc5q9mds2j1vju6q40n86u88ms25qb@4ax.com>
<0001HW.1FAED4FD011BF2327000079342CF@news.giganews.com>
<otpvla02a2u@news7.newsguy.com>
<0001HW.1FB0D1920193246A700006E012CF@news.giganews.com>
<otqb0n0l5s@news4.newsguy.com>
<0001HW.1FB10B5201A0AD47700006E012CF@news.giganews.com>
<otstch02d2i@news4.newsguy.com>
<0001HW.1FB23B110031E64A70000C23F2CF@news.giganews.com>
<ottei502p62@news4.newsguy.com>
<fIKdndMxgZe535_HnZ2dnUU7-b_NnZ2d@giganews.com>
<071120171841197711%nospam@nospam.invalid>
<6LGdndCoffiYxJ_HnZ2dnUU7-TPNnZ2d@giganews.com>
<071120172018045993%nospam@nospam.invalid>
<fb2dnZSTmK_l5p_HnZ2dnUU7-TXNnZ2d@giganews.com>
<071120172254470188%nospam@nospam.invalid>
<d6OdnUFKR8FiGJ_HnZ2dnUU7-VnNnZ2d@giganews.com>
<071120172334363553%nospam@nospam.invalid>
From: Ron C <r.capik@verizon.net>
Organization: Say what?
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2017 20:25:43 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/52.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <071120172334363553%nospam@nospam.invalid>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 171108-2, 11/08/2017), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Message-ID: <p7SdnS7nBegKM57HnZ2dnUU7-LvNnZ2d@giganews.com>
Lines: 45
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-dACaeQ6md+wmIM5VA3GxOk6YfRdqaFLrEa7nzEGHno0YgLUnb5BL0a0VyYFnZdpMq7kBefONiSey9D1!xZii26Dr1Dt2AK3kxvAR3YO9IsPF+fCUDCAF2hYpnHdhmFE4BdI6MlRpp2j3oisd4o9nLJ9aIgw=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 3694
Print Article
Forward Article
On 11/7/2017 11:34 PM, nospam wrote:
> In article<d6OdnUFKR8FiGJ_HnZ2dnUU7-VnNnZ2d@giganews.com>, Ron C
><r.capik@verizon.net> wrote:
> 
>>>>>> Nothing that I know of in Photoshop emulates the actual
>>>>>> physical actions of hand/cardboard dodging.
>>>>>
>>>>> now you know.
>>>>>
>>>>> <https://helpx.adobe.com/photoshop/using/dodge-burn-image-areas.html&...
>>>>>      The Dodge tool and the Burn tool lighten or darken areas of the
>>>>>      image. These tools are based on a traditional darkroom technique for
>>>>>      regulating exposure on specific areas of a print.
>>>>
>>>> Says nothing about that actual visceral actions used in
>>>> the process ...back in the day.
>>>
>>> instead of moving cardboard, it's moving a mouse or stylus. big deal.
>>>
>>> what it doesn't say is it has a major advantage of being able to
>>> instantly undo anything, versus having to redo the entire print in a
>>> darkroom.
>>>
>>> dodge/burn is also incredibly primitive and imprecise, but back in the
>>> day, there weren't very many other options. now there are.
>>>
>> So you're admitting that the wet darkroom analogy is flawed.
> 
> nope.
> 
> the analogy is spot on, however, the technique is obsolete.
> 
>> I can live with that.
> 
> you're living in the past and refuse to learn newer and better ways.
> 
OK, you've got me pegged. I also listen to music with my old eight-track
cartridge player on my vacuum tube hi-fi and watch VHS tapes on
an analog CRT TV-set. I'm going back to sleep now.
-- 
==
Later...
Ron C
--