From: Noons <>
Subject: Re: Ah well...
Full headers:
From: Noons <>
Subject: Re: Ah well...
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2017 18:07:41 +1100
Organization: NOYB
Lines: 32
Message-ID: <ou0us0$98p$>
References: <otqt5l$l8u$>
<otrp3r$9q9$> <071120170952032256%nospam@nospam.invalid>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2017 07:07:45 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info:; posting-host="56751e1ff239489efc5338b6c1b38645";
logging-data="9497"; mail-complaints-to="";posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+RHV1nlmNhZjyHcj49zoRM"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
In-Reply-To: <071120170952032256%nospam@nospam.invalid>
Content-Language: en-US
Cancel-Lock: sha1:lE0Aer3mW7sUmyCV2zgFqRRHbGw=
Print Article
Forward Article
On 8/11/2017 1:52 @wiz, nospam wrote:

>> No.  They build the same boring old cameras that were great news 55
>> years ago: slrs.  The "D" in front is just for marketing.
> nonsense. the d is for digital. there weren't digital cameras 55 years
> ago.

But there were slrs.  And that is old news.

>> Nowadays?  No way!
> considering what it can do, it's cheap.

Like I said: nowadays? No way!

> nikon lenses are quite good.

when they work...

>> Aww, let me see...
>> Lack of modern products at a reasonable price, capable of keeping them
>> afloat while other companies sell a better product and stay on the market?
> nonsense.

Good.  Keep using their crap.
I won't.