In article <email@example.com>, Noons<firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote: > >> No. They build the same boring old cameras that were great news 55 > >> years ago: slrs. The "D" in front is just for marketing. > > > > nonsense. the d is for digital. there weren't digital cameras 55 years > > ago. > > But there were slrs. And that is old news. slrs are very useful, with the results from today's slrs blowing away anything from 55 years ago, including medium format. > >> Nowadays? No way! > > > > considering what it can do, it's cheap. > > Like I said: nowadays? No way! yes way. > > nikon lenses are quite good. > > when they work... they work quite well, so well in fact, that someone designed an adapter so that nikon lenses could be used on canon cameras *and* converts the electrical signals, not just the usual metal ring that is just a mount. > >> Aww, let me see... > >> Lack of modern products at a reasonable price, capable of keeping them > >> afloat while other companies sell a better product and stay on the market? > > > > nonsense. > > Good. Keep using their crap. > I won't. your loss.