From: Whisky-dave <>
Subject: Re: Jupiter photos
Full headers:
X-Received: by with SMTP id n17mr4598790qkh.36.1510243095879;
Thu, 09 Nov 2017 07:58:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by with SMTP id a126mr193194vke.10.1510243095768;
Thu, 09 Nov 2017 07:58:15 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2017 07:58:15 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <ou1o6q$1cf9$>
Injection-Info:; posting-host=; posting-account=Fal3rgoAAABua4brvRuRwdmPfigIDi6x
References: <l8VMB.233452$mj4.3561@fx29.fr7> <ou1o6q$1cf9$>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <>
Subject: Re: Jupiter photos
From: Whisky-dave <>
Injection-Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2017 15:58:15 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 32
Print Article
Forward Article
On Thursday, 9 November 2017 14:20:16 UTC, Mayayana  wrote:
> "David B."<DavidB@nomail.afraid.invalid> wrote
> | 
> |
> | Fascinating images.
>   Except that the colors are made-up, 

all colours are made up, it;s what our eye does, colours don;t really exist.
But I do no what you mean the colours are used to sperate things that are going on making them
easier to see. A bit less crude than a highlight pen :-)

>so what
> you're really seeing is sci-fi fantasy.

Not really it's being  able to see more wavelenghs or more information than the human eye could
actually see.

Itls a bit likke claiming that bats don;t fly at night because you can;t see them in the dark, in
ordee to see how they fly yuo could use infra-red light with an infra-red sensative camera, you'd
see bats flying but not their correct colour.

It;s a bit like teh link below we can;t see carbon dioxide in the air but colouring it makes it
easier to see and understand,

So as long as you appreciate this there shouldn't be a problem.

 On the
> bright side, NASA images are public domain
> by law.