Subject: Re: Saw the new Panasonic G9 at the ProFusion show today
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin1!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!peer02.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!spln!extra.newsguy.com!newsp.newsguy.com!news3
From: PeterN <"peter,newdelete"@deleteverizon.net>
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Subject: Re: Saw the new Panasonic G9 at the ProFusion show today
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2017 10:22:24 -0500
Organization: NewsGuy - Unlimited Usenet $23.95
Lines: 30
Message-ID: <ou4g7k0dpt@news3.newsguy.com>
References: <c15a5988-788c-43ce-9e21-69011d62bf13@googlegroups.com>
<MPG.346ee24dddc92f2198cf01@news.supernews.com>
<0e6f2c5e-9e6a-4f86-bdaa-dca71912a002@googlegroups.com>
<here-0B6E81.05353910112017@news.individual.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: p7b4080e504ee0b752688caaebf18817cb633dff1366b0f95.newsdawg.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/52.4.0
In-Reply-To: <here-0B6E81.05353910112017@news.individual.net>
Content-Language: en-US
X-Received-Body-CRC: 3512764634
X-Received-Bytes: 2361
Print Article
Forward Article
On 11/9/2017 11:35 PM, android wrote:
> In article<0e6f2c5e-9e6a-4f86-bdaa-dca71912a002@googlegroups.com>,
>   Rich A<rander3127@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Thursday, November 9, 2017 at 4:08:53 PM UTC-5, Alfred Molon wrote:
>>> In article<c15a5988-788c-43ce-9e21-69011d62bf13@googlegroups.com>, Rich
>>> A says...
>>>> The body is around $2000.00.
>>>
>>> You mean Canadian dollars? Should be 1700 USD/Euro.
>>>
>>> The body is indeed big & heavy.
>>   
>> It's magnesium (to its credit) and like a DSLR so yes, heavy.  IMO, this
>> divergence from the original promise of the m4/3rds system (compactness) is
>> probably a mistake.  Sony has even kept their FF bodies compact.
> 
> The sensor size of the m4/3 is inherited from the 4/3 that made the same
> promise... I had an Olympus Evolt-E300 and it was not compact at all! I
> turned out that if yu wanted the same brightness, noise and DOF as
> achieved by larger sensor cams then you had to make and use big lenses
> with a lot of glass. Lot's of pain but no gain...
> 

One of my friends went to Fuji. When he puts his 100-400 on it, the feel 
of weight difference is not all that much different from the D500, with 
the 80-400. I will add that with the Fuji 100-400, is a great lens.

-- 
PeterN