Subject: Re: Dullest photographic subjects (purely subjective)
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!peer01.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!spln!extra.newsguy.com!newsp.newsguy.com!news6
From: PeterN <"peter,newdelete"@deleteverizon.net>
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Subject: Re: Dullest photographic subjects (purely subjective)
Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2017 12:36:50 -0500
Organization: NewsGuy - Unlimited Usenet $23.95
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <ouprea01r8t@news6.newsguy.com>
References: <4bf99e77-721a-4377-9cb1-04167a578627@googlegroups.com>
<0001HW.1FBFCCE203600E2470000A50D2CF@news.giganews.com>
<LauraWilliams.14561458@photobanter.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pc9adca40f490520efb7de39dac23c74fba08dad29fa31817.newsdawg.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/52.4.0
In-Reply-To: <LauraWilliams.14561458@photobanter.com>
Content-Language: en-US
X-Received-Body-CRC: 4090217146
X-Received-Bytes: 1409
Print Article
Forward Article
On 11/18/2017 5:39 AM, LauraWilliams wrote:
> 'Savageduck[_3_ Wrote:
>> ;1049231']
>> Most shots of animals in zoos.
>>
> 
> I agree with this, the rest does not seem stupid to me if done
> professionally!
> 

It's a question of putting you own eye into the image. As to the others, 
they need not be done professionally, just with an understanding of 
light, and purpose.


-- 
PeterN