Subject: Re: Dullest photographic subjects (purely subjective)
Full headers:
From: PeterN <"peter,newdelete">
Subject: Re: Dullest photographic subjects (purely subjective)
Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2017 12:36:50 -0500
Organization: NewsGuy - Unlimited Usenet $23.95
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <>
References: <>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
In-Reply-To: <>
Content-Language: en-US
X-Received-Body-CRC: 4090217146
X-Received-Bytes: 1409
Print Article
Forward Article
On 11/18/2017 5:39 AM, LauraWilliams wrote:
> 'Savageduck[_3_ Wrote:
>> ;1049231']
>> Most shots of animals in zoos.
> I agree with this, the rest does not seem stupid to me if done
> professionally!

It's a question of putting you own eye into the image. As to the others, 
they need not be done professionally, just with an understanding of 
light, and purpose.