From: RichA <rander3128@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Dullest photographic subjects (purely subjective)
Full headers:
X-Received: by 10.55.160.151 with SMTP id j145mr5988660qke.58.1511050744444;
Sat, 18 Nov 2017 16:19:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.31.157.131 with SMTP id g125mr833957vke.14.1511050744293;
Sat, 18 Nov 2017 16:19:04 -0800 (PST)
Path: news.netfront.net!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!m31no291747qtf.0!news-out.google.com!t48ni683qtc.1!nntp.google.com!m31no291746qtf.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2017 16:19:03 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <ouqcnc02352@news6.newsguy.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=65.94.54.197; posting-account=8Vsz_woAAABQPV3Epo66m_rYvK1EHzOV
NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.94.54.197
References: <4bf99e77-721a-4377-9cb1-04167a578627@googlegroups.com>
<0001HW.1FBFCCE203600E2470000A50D2CF@news.giganews.com> <LauraWilliams.14561458@photobanter.com>
<ouprea01r8t@news6.newsguy.com> <oups7501rkq@news6.newsguy.com>
<lg911d939u0in99ktunr6ull6184c9ir1k@4ax.com> <ouqcnc02352@news6.newsguy.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <45d956fc-a7d9-4184-97d4-064041154f88@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Dullest photographic subjects (purely subjective)
From: RichA <rander3128@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2017 00:19:04 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 34
Print Article
Forward Article
On Saturday, 18 November 2017 14:32:16 UTC-8, PeterN  wrote:
> On 11/18/2017 4:29 PM, Eric Stevens wrote:
> > On Sat, 18 Nov 2017 12:50:04 -0500, PeterN
> > <"peter,newdelete"@deleteverizon.net> wrote:
> > 
> >> On 11/18/2017 12:36 PM, PeterN wrote:
> >>> On 11/18/2017 5:39 AM, LauraWilliams wrote:
> >>>> 'Savageduck[_3_ Wrote:
> >>>>> ;1049231']
> >>>>> Most shots of animals in zoos.
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> I agree with this, the rest does not seem stupid to me if done
> >>>> professionally!
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> It's a question of putting you own eye into the image. As to the others,
> >>> they need not be done professionally, just with an understanding of
> >>> light, and purpose.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> I should have added composition, and the subject doing something unusual
> >> are also important.
> > 
> > Yes, the subject should of itself be of some interest.
> > 
> You mean like this minimalist?
> <https://www.dropbox.com/s/f42d6d8p04xu2sc/Untitled-1.jpg?dl=0>
> 
> -- 
> PeterN

Doesn't look like a photo.  More like a computer-generated dot. 
I'd like to stick a photographer who thinks all things are worthy into an integrating sphere and
tell them to shoot anything but themselves.