Subject: Re: HDR rainforest
On Sun, 19 Nov 2017 06:46:24 +0100, android<firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Eric Stevens<email@example.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, 18 Nov 2017 17:14:34 -0800 (PST), RichA<firstname.lastname@example.org>
>> >On Saturday, 18 November 2017 15:47:01 UTC-8, Alfred Molon wrote:
>> >> What do you think about this picture:
>> >> http://www.molon.de/galleries/Malaysia/Endau/Waterfalls/img.php?pic...
>> >> Photomatix Pro with five RAW images (0EV, +- 2EV, +-4EV);
>> >> "photographic" setting.
>> >> The water of the waterfall and the sky on top are very bright, while the
>> >> shadow areas in the trees are very dark.
>> >> --
>> >> Alfred Molon
>> >> Olympus E-series DSLRs and micro 4/3 forum at
>> >> http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/MyOlympus/
>> >> http://myolympus.org/ photo sharing site
>> >It's ok, but I was never a fan of the neon-greens this produces.
>> The greens look OK to me but I suppose it depends upon what you are
>> used to.
>I leaning towards RichA on this one but YMMV...
>Get a used calorimeter that works with this:
>Free to download and use...
That's not much help. The question is what was the original green?
There is no such thing as a standard green for foliage. Look at the
range of greens here
To a considerable extent it depends upon the light.