Subject: Re: HDR rainforest
Full headers:
From: PeterN <"peter,newdelete">
Subject: Re: HDR rainforest
Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2017 13:36:35 -0500
Organization: NewsGuy - Unlimited Usenet $23.95
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <>
References: <>
<ouqm7t$6lb$> <>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
In-Reply-To: <>
Content-Language: en-US
X-Received-Bytes: 1445
X-Received-Body-CRC: 1268179748
Print Article
Forward Article
On 11/19/2017 9:40 AM, Alfred Molon wrote:
> In article<>, PeterN says...
>> IMHO it is indeed a badly processed image. I suspect that the burning of
>> the highlights, and lack of shadow detail,  are the result of either
>> shooting in low quality JPEG, and/or bad processing. The over saturation
>> and over-saturation and high luminescence  of the green, are clues to
>> poor processing.
> Ehhpp... this is an HDR done from five RAW images.

There were two choices.