From: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Subject: Re: Slimy Chinese drone firm tried to silence security analyst
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Subject: Re: Slimy Chinese drone firm tried to silence security analyst
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2017 13:55:53 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 10
Message-ID: <211120171355532912%nospam@nospam.invalid>
References: <44bc261b-de89-407a-8c99-6f95de40586a@googlegroups.com> <MPG.347e9347505b023b98cf22@news.supernews.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="a201445927defab661daa349d0caea61";
logging-data="25224"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19I4r5N5zWm5TMFX2418fEO"
User-Agent: Thoth/1.9.0 (Mac OS X)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:kOD1ka7m+ctXSP/9ywp3znWgE1g=
Print Article
Forward Article
In article<MPG.347e9347505b023b98cf22@news.supernews.com>, Alfred
Molon<alfred_molon@yahoo.com> wrote:

> In article<44bc261b-de89-407a-8c99-6f95de40586a@googlegroups.com>, 
> RichA says...
> > http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-42052473
> 
> Why are they slimy?

read the article. it's rather clear.