From: android <here@there.was>
Subject: Re: UK Nanny State. Making Britain safe from freedom, on ban at atime
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin3!goblin.stu.neva.ru!news-2.dfn.de!news.dfn.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: android <here@there.was>
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Subject: Re: UK Nanny State. Making Britain safe from freedom, on ban at a
time
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 06:11:11 +0100
Organization: the center
Lines: 10
Message-ID: <f81l3fF5tlfU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <c8bdd3a6-f005-4a9b-afe1-af5cda451693@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net EahJE+jJrI1nyAarRBNIdwZgAi8WrYRp2upR1mhd/Qy92kU+xz
Cancel-Lock: sha1:ZoI8TdQLrsnL0Iu7Nl9Qm54V0Js=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:52.0)
Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0
In-Reply-To: <c8bdd3a6-f005-4a9b-afe1-af5cda451693@googlegroups.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Print Article
Forward Article
On  2017-11-27 00:15, RichA wrote:
> Sure, it's ok to blanket a country with 500,000 CCTV cameras, ensuring no one will ever have any
kind of privacy again except locked in their bedrooms with no windows, but fly a drone above 400ft? 
BAN IT!!
> 
> http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-42126150
> 
They better have their devices turned off and left in another room too. 
Anyways, they have chosen to go their own way now outside the union... 
But you being one of HM subjects do have a vested interest, of course! :-))

Privately flied drones are both invasion of privacy and safety, no doubt...