From: RichA <rander3128@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: UK Nanny State. Making Britain safe from freedom, on ban at a time
Full headers:
X-Received: by 10.55.75.80 with SMTP id y77mr32760706qka.3.1511818622440;
Mon, 27 Nov 2017 13:37:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.31.162.19 with SMTP id l19mr1531491vke.4.1511818622336; Mon,
27 Nov 2017 13:37:02 -0800 (PST)
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!peer01.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!g35no1066091qtk.1!news-out.google.com!v55ni1975qtc.0!nntp.google.com!m31no1065207qtf.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 13:37:01 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <f81l3fF5tlfU1@mid.individual.net>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=184.75.212.29;
posting-account=8Vsz_woAAABQPV3Epo66m_rYvK1EHzOV
NNTP-Posting-Host: 184.75.212.29
References: <c8bdd3a6-f005-4a9b-afe1-af5cda451693@googlegroups.com> <f81l3fF5tlfU1@mid.individual.net>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <b7785217-d83a-46d2-a0a9-f0e789c28862@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: UK Nanny State. Making Britain safe from freedom, on ban at a time
From: RichA <rander3128@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 21:37:02 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Received-Body-CRC: 3345326449
X-Received-Bytes: 2211
Print Article
Forward Article
On Monday, 27 November 2017 00:11:19 UTC-5, android  wrote:
> On  2017-11-27 00:15, RichA wrote:
> > Sure, it's ok to blanket a country with 500,000 CCTV cameras, ensuring no one will ever have any
kind of privacy again except locked in their bedrooms with no windows, but fly a drone above 400ft? 
BAN IT!!
> > 
> > http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-42126150
> > 
> They better have their devices turned off and left in another room too. 
> Anyways, they have chosen to go their own way now outside the union... 
> But you being one of HM subjects do have a vested interest, of course! :-))
> 
> Privately flied drones are both invasion of privacy and safety, no doubt...

Progress entails risk.  The "not in my backyard" types should be relegated to Luddism they deserve,
they should go live in caves somewhere.  

https://www.dpreview.com/news/2794527040/proposed-uk-bill-will-let-p...