From: android <here@there.was>
Subject: Re: UK Nanny State. Making Britain safe from freedom, on ban at atime
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: android <here@there.was>
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Subject: Re: UK Nanny State. Making Britain safe from freedom, on ban at a
time
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 05:00:53 +0100
Organization: the center
Lines: 37
Message-ID: <f845blFnvqdU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <c8bdd3a6-f005-4a9b-afe1-af5cda451693@googlegroups.com>
<f81l3fF5tlfU1@mid.individual.net>
<b7785217-d83a-46d2-a0a9-f0e789c28862@googlegroups.com>
<0001HW.1FCCC44301480B9C70000CE6E2CF@news.giganews.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net jgCbbWUEiY0y08MaOKQD1gDvhfhH/H/SMyYKJli1k4yzlnDl+y
Cancel-Lock: sha1:VO25BaObPNStvXGnTfHvaGXVbtU=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:52.0)
Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0
In-Reply-To: <0001HW.1FCCC44301480B9C70000CE6E2CF@news.giganews.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Print Article
Forward Article
On  2017-11-27 23:08, Savageduck wrote:
> On Nov 27, 2017, RichA wrote
> (in article<b7785217-d83a-46d2-a0a9-f0e789c28862@googlegroups.com>):
> 
>> On Monday, 27 November 2017 00:11:19 UTC-5, android wrote:
>>> On 2017-11-27 00:15, RichA wrote:
>>>> Sure, it's ok to blanket a country with 500,000 CCTV cameras, ensuring no
>>>> one will ever have any kind of privacy again except locked in their
>>>> bedrooms with no windows, but fly a drone above 400ft? BAN IT!!
>>>>
>>>> http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-42126150
>>> They better have their devices turned off and left in another room too.
>>> Anyways, they have chosen to go their own way now outside the union...
>>> But you being one of HM subjects do have a vested interest, of course! :-))
>>>
>>> Privately flied drones are both invasion of privacy and safety, no doubt...
>>
>> Progress entails risk. The "not in my backyard" types should be relegated to
>> Luddism they deserve, they should go live in caves somewhere.
>>
>> https://www.dpreview.com/news/2794527040/proposed-uk-bill-will-let-p...
>> cers-ground-and-seize-drones
> 
> ...and then we have this:
> 
> <http://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/Drone-pilot-arrested-for-drop...
> leaflets-over-12385138.php>

Ain't that violating some amendment???
> 
> <http://www.mercurynews.com/2017/10/16/firefighters-say-drones-inter...
> with-their-work-one-pilot-arrested>
> 
So the flying of drones conflicted with saving children from buildings 
on fire? Drones are soo coool...
-- 
teleportation kills