From: Whisky-dave <whisky.dave@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: UK Nanny State. Making Britain safe from freedom, on ban at a time
Full headers:
X-Received: by 10.237.33.193 with SMTP id m1mr24773293qtc.17.1511861698498;
Tue, 28 Nov 2017 01:34:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.31.162.19 with SMTP id l19mr1651018vke.4.1511861698360; Tue,
28 Nov 2017 01:34:58 -0800 (PST)
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin1!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!peer01.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer03.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!g35no1111317qtk.1!news-out.google.com!t48ni2581qtc.1!nntp.google.com!g35no1111315qtk.1!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 01:34:57 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <b7785217-d83a-46d2-a0a9-f0e789c28862@googlegroups.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=138.37.90.65; posting-account=Fal3rgoAAABua4brvRuRwdmPfigIDi6x
NNTP-Posting-Host: 138.37.90.65
References: <c8bdd3a6-f005-4a9b-afe1-af5cda451693@googlegroups.com>
<f81l3fF5tlfU1@mid.individual.net> <b7785217-d83a-46d2-a0a9-f0e789c28862@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <2a2c8d2d-f33e-4e04-abac-765c606cbe5f@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: UK Nanny State. Making Britain safe from freedom, on ban at a time
From: Whisky-dave <whisky.dave@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 09:34:58 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Received-Body-CRC: 2694127773
X-Received-Bytes: 2546
Print Article
Forward Article
On Monday, 27 November 2017 21:37:05 UTC, RichA  wrote:
> On Monday, 27 November 2017 00:11:19 UTC-5, android  wrote:
> > On  2017-11-27 00:15, RichA wrote:
> > > Sure, it's ok to blanket a country with 500,000 CCTV cameras, ensuring no one will ever have
any kind of privacy again except locked in their bedrooms with no windows, but fly a drone above
400ft?  BAN IT!!
> > > 
> > > http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-42126150
> > > 
> > They better have their devices turned off and left in another room too. 
> > Anyways, they have chosen to go their own way now outside the union... 
> > But you being one of HM subjects do have a vested interest, of course! :-))
> > 
> > Privately flied drones are both invasion of privacy and safety, no doubt...
> 
> Progress entails risk. 

Doesn't have to.

> The "not in my backyard" types should be relegated to Luddism they deserve, they should go live in
caves somewhere.  
> 
>
https://www.dpreview.com/news/2794527040/proposed-uk-bill-will-let-p...

Get users to need a license, seems reasonable to me.
Or make it legal to beat the crap out of anyone flying a drone that annoys you.