From: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Subject: Re: CF cards apparently not dead yet
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin2!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Subject: Re: CF cards apparently not dead yet
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 14:38:09 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 12
Message-ID: <291120171438094281%nospam@nospam.invalid>
References: <0006b719-570c-4f61-a7dd-8ff25252f8ba@googlegroups.com> <MPG.34891a724d696eaf98cf29@news.supernews.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="2b4110c42fb6ef7a814be0edc7a55102";
logging-data="4136"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19faV8kpOpL1l74y9Drvm1L"
User-Agent: Thoth/1.9.0 (Mac OS X)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:owOVy3CRANBbmK4hm5YdS90EEkc=
Print Article
Forward Article
In article<MPG.34891a724d696eaf98cf29@news.supernews.com>, Alfred
Molon<alfred_molon@yahoo.com> wrote:

> 
> 510 MB/s write speed. SD cards top out at 300 MB/s, or is there anything 
> faster?

xqd

> Bus speed is up to 624MB/s according to wikipedia.

which bus?