From: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Subject: Re: CF cards apparently not dead yet
Full headers:
From: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Subject: Re: CF cards apparently not dead yet
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 21:55:17 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <291120172155172901%nospam@nospam.invalid>
References: <> <> <> <291120171552201340%nospam@nospam.invalid> <>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info:; posting-host="0443a8dc2665df5d13e96fb9df45c326";
logging-data="11676"; mail-complaints-to="";posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19PPdPBkX6YWsKE5CNYUXTZ"
User-Agent: Thoth/1.9.0 (Mac OS X)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:egTOR2D5ozeurHSvhd7W+r4EX74=
Print Article
Forward Article
In article<>, PeterN
<"peter,newdelete"> wrote:

> >> It depends on your camera. If your camera cannot support higher speeds,
> >> save your money.
> > 
> > higher speeds help when copying photos to the computer, whether or not
> > the camera can fully utilize it.
> >
> It depends.

only if you're mayayana stuck using winxp and slow usb2 will it matter.

for the rest of the world, the card speed is the limiting factor, not
the computer.