Subject: Re: CF cards apparently not dead yet
Full headers:
From: PeterN <"peter,newdelete">
Subject: Re: CF cards apparently not dead yet
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 22:01:02 -0500
Organization: NewsGuy - Unlimited Usenet $23.95
Lines: 23
Message-ID: <>
References: <>
<> <291120171552201340%nospam@nospam.invalid>
<> <291120172155172901%nospam@nospam.invalid>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
In-Reply-To: <291120172155172901%nospam@nospam.invalid>
Content-Language: en-US
X-Received-Bytes: 1714
X-Received-Body-CRC: 988795413
Print Article
Forward Article
On 11/29/2017 9:55 PM, nospam wrote:
> In article<>, PeterN
> <"peter,newdelete"> wrote:
>>>> It depends on your camera. If your camera cannot support higher speeds,
>>>> save your money.
>>> higher speeds help when copying photos to the computer, whether or not
>>> the camera can fully utilize it.
>> It depends.
> only if you're mayayana stuck using winxp and slow usb2 will it matter.
> for the rest of the world, the card speed is the limiting factor, not
> the computer.

Additional time to download a card, is not an important area of 
photography, unless you are a photo journalist.