From: android <here@there.was>
Subject: Re: There Will Not Be A Fujifilm X-T2S
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin3!goblin.stu.neva.ru!news-2.dfn.de!news.dfn.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: android <here@there.was>
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Subject: Re: There Will Not Be A Fujifilm X-T2S
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 09:07:17 +0100
Organization: the center
Lines: 7
Message-ID: <f89shlF3jftU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <f89k8uF1q43U2@mid.individual.net>
<0001HW.1FCFE732003AB5A470000085F2CF@news.giganews.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net IihoYpxn+AcOjc7wPNhOWAHmP53iYNvNRtyVRt6M22IBLMnTHI
Cancel-Lock: sha1:872//XhTsoD9xOvkP7rq8eknMTY=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:52.0)
Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0
In-Reply-To: <0001HW.1FCFE732003AB5A470000085F2CF@news.giganews.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Print Article
Forward Article
On  2017-11-30 08:13, Savageduck wrote:
> I also suspect that the proposed IBIS X-H1 is going to be optimized for video
> to separate it from the X-Pro2, X-T2, and X-E3.

Uhu... Homemovie One it is!
-- 
teleportation kills