Next <
From: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Subject: Re: CF cards apparently not dead yet
Full headers:
Path: news.netfront.net!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Subject: Re: CF cards apparently not dead yet
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 12:55:32 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <301120171255321938%nospam@nospam.invalid>
References: <0006b719-570c-4f61-a7dd-8ff25252f8ba@googlegroups.com> <MPG.34891a724d696eaf98cf29@news.supernews.com> <ovn6hb0mmk@news4.newsguy.com> <291120171552201340%nospam@nospam.invalid> <ovnquv0fjr@news3.newsguy.com> <291120172155172901%nospam@nospam.invalid> <ovns9h1g4h@news3.newsguy.com> <5a6eab34-9d52-4ef3-b589-f5b7ee5f4d31@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="0443a8dc2665df5d13e96fb9df45c326";
logging-data="16124"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19LvH/PEOI+6pJCCfVZCHNC"
User-Agent: Thoth/1.9.0 (Mac OS X)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:u8Y4UYJ8BLxIAUu7Eca/1h1TBq8=
Print Article
Forward Article
In article<5a6eab34-9d52-4ef3-b589-f5b7ee5f4d31@googlegroups.com>,
Whisky-dave<whisky.dave@gmail.com> wrote:

> > Additional time to download a card, is not an important area of 
> > photography, unless you are a photo journalist.
> 
> It can be, especaily if you've come back from a holiday with umpteen cards
> that need putting on a computer, it's amazing just how slow USB2 is compared
> to USB3 once you're used to USB3.

no shit.
.
> Tonight I'll be off-loading ~8GB from card to computer, it usually takes a
> couple of minutes on USB3  with USB2 it's more like 15mins+

now multiply that by 32 for a 256 gig card.