From: Eric Stevens <>
Subject: Re: CF cards apparently not dead yet
Full headers:
From: Eric Stevens <>
Subject: Re: CF cards apparently not dead yet
Message-ID: <>
References: <> <> <291120171552201340%nospam@nospam.invalid> <> <291120172155172901%nospam@nospam.invalid> <> <291120172209102843%nospam@nospam.invalid> <> <> <301120171254418909%nospam@nospam.invalid> <> <301120171946271329%nospam@nospam.invalid>
User-Agent: ForteAgent/
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 35
Organization: Forte -
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2017 15:37:44 +1300
X-Received-Body-CRC: 2727543659
X-Received-Bytes: 2332
Print Article
Forward Article
On Thu, 30 Nov 2017 19:46:27 -0500, nospam<nospam@nospam.invalid>

>In article<>, Tony Cooper
><> wrote:
>> So we have two people with anecdotal versions.  One says he's not
>> concerned with the amount of time it takes to upload photos from a
>> card, and the other is concerned that it takes 15 minutes to upload
>> his videos.
>since the transfer is local, it's called copying.
>upload or download would be when it involves a remote system (i.e., the
>cloud), which it does not.
>> If you extrapolate that to the "rest of the world", then 50% of the
>> rest of the world aren't concerned, thus disproving your claim.
>math fail.
>the reality is that most people aren't interested in waiting a half
>hour for their photos and videos to copy.

Most people don't have half an hour's worth of photos or videos to
>you always argue against productivity and efficiency. 
>actually, you always argue no matter what anyone says.


Eric Stevens